Copyright Meg MawL © 1997 - 2003. All rights reserved.
For an intense explanation of how the climate affects the coastline and fossil deposition see:
THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGES ON THE TOPOLOGY OF THE
EAST COAST OF THE UNITED STATES AND DEPOSITION OF MARINE FOSSILS
Light Weight:
Some teeth are noticably lighter in weight than other teeth.
Third or fourth row teeth are lighter
in weight than a similar sized first row tooth. The underlying
dentin was not completely formed. The tooth had a larger central
pulp cavity. There was less dentin in this area to swell
and many times resulted in a "flat spot" in the blade
enamel right below the point of the V in the display side
bourrelet. Relatively rare - maybe 1 in 250 to 300 teeth found.
(We have several fifth row teeth -- nothing but enamel shell; no
root, no pulp, no dentin.)
Man verses Megalodon:
Everybody should know that the old films showing the cavemen fighting a dinosaur were bogus. Dinosaurs went extinct about 60 million years before man emerged as a species.
Is this also true for the megalodon? Could an ancient ancestor of ours ever have been eaten by a meg? The answer to this question depends on when you believe man emerged on the earth's Tree of Life. The last fossil records of the megalodon before it went extinct were teeth found near Ishikawa, Japan, from the late Pliocene Epoch - about 2 million years ago. Modern man (homo sapiens) has only been around for about 1 million years. Many scientists believe that Homo habilis was the first "human". This guy lived sometime between 1.9 to 1.6 million years ago. Other finds seem to show that "Australopithecus garhi" who lived about 2.5 million years ago was the first toolmaker. Most of us have heard about "Lucy" - "Australopithecus afarensis" who lived 3.6 to 2.9 million years ago. Another human ancestor aged 5.8 to 5.2 million years - "Ardipithecus ramidus kadabba" - hominid fossil remains were found at Middle Awash, Ethiopia. Recently anthropologists have discovered a new species in Chad, Africa, about 1500 miles to the east of the other discoveries. This creature named "Sahelanthropus tchadensis" seems to show more human than chimpanzee characteristics and lived almost 7 million years ago.
If you frame your beliefs in just the right way, there are plenty of reasons to justify a senario wherein man could have struggled with megalodon. There is little doubt as to who would have come out the winner.
Megalodon Size:
Some paleontologists believe that the size of a megalodon can be approximated from the size of one of the front teeth. Demon, Gottfried et. al.(1); leading experts on the megalodon, in 1996, developed a formula and a graph that can be used to calculate the length and weight of the beast if the height of the First Anterior (AI) tooth is known. This is simply an estimate based on a derived linear relationship between tooth size and body length and weight.
The length formula is:
TL = [(0.96 X AI-SH) minus 0.22]
Total Length of the megalodon [in meters] = ((0.96) times (AI Slant Height [in cm]) minus 0.22)
MegMawL converted this to more commonly used measurements and we use a simplified and only slightly less accurate version of this formula:
TL = 8 X AI-SH
Total Length [in feet] = 8 times (AI Slant Height [in inches])
If we apply this formula to the largest tooth we have - 7 5/8" (19.37 cm), and we assume that it was an AI and restored correctly, the length of this animal would have been 61 feet. The more complicated formula yields 60.27 feet.
The graph for the weight shows that it would have weighed 96,338 lbs (48.67 tons).
(1.)
Gottfried, Michael D., Compagno,
Leonard J. V., and Bowman, S. Curtis.
1996. Chapter 7. Size and skeletal
anatomy of the Giant "Megatooth" shark
Carcharodon megalodon. pp. 55- 66.
In: Klimley, A. Peter, and Ainley,
David G. (editors). Great White Sharks
the Biology of Carcharodon carcharias
ISBN: 0124150314
Academic Press. San Diego, Cal.
Member:
A MEMBER is a smaller unit of a FORMATION, usually a geographically distinct portion of the FORMATION deposited in the same timeframe.
Mottling:
Coloration that is distinctively different from the base color. Mottling can occur in the Blade Enamel, the Root and less commonly in the Bourrelet. Mottling can be gradual changes in color or very well defined lines or areas.
Nutrient Holes:
Generally C. megalodon shark teeth have one or more small holes around the center of the display side root. This holes were where the arteries and veins entered and left the tooth carrying nutrients to the "live" part of the interior. Fully developed teeth had no nerve tissue as we humans do. This animal did not have to worry about a broken tooth hurting. Do not confuse these holes with the larger holes which the Borer Clam made and used as home until he outgrew them. Some teeth have Nutrient Grooves instead of holes.
Ocean Regression:
A seaward migration of the shoreline caused primarily by general global cooling and the subsequent capture and removal of water in the form of glaciers and polar ice caps. In other words, less seawater - more exposed land mass.
Ocean Transgression:
A inland migration of the shoreline caused primarily by general global warming and the subsequent release of water from glaciers and polar ice caps. In other words, more seawater - less exposed land mass.
Overlies:
OVERLIES means that one FORMATION lies over another and is therefore younger.
Pathological Features:
Physiologic or anatomic deviations from the norm, i.e., structural abnormalities.
So much happened in the mouth of the shark when it bit into the prey animal that there was a good chance that some of the blood in the water belonged to the predator. Broken bits of prey animal bone, broken and whole shark teeth in the chunks of flesh could easily have damaged the "Tooth Generating Gland" or the "bud" of a new tooth. If that source was damaged, it might have produced a deformed teeth.
SOME DEFORMITIES:
1. Crinkles in the Blade Enamel edge, generally at the
junction of the Enamel and Bourrelet.
2. Abnormal Curvature or Fang.
3. Nibs on one or both Root Lobes.
4. Malformation of the Root or Root Lobes, Tip, Blade Enamel.
5. Abnormally thick or thin.
6. Multi-tip.
7. Teeth grown together.
Placoid Scales:
Placoid scales or "dermal denticles" are small, hard, tooth-like structures in the skin of a shark or ray that corresponds to the scales of other fish. They are more pronounced in some sharks than others (ex. Bramble Shark). They have the same structure as a tooth - an outer layer of enamel, dentin and a central pulp cavity.
Shark teeth are actually modified placoid scales as are the "barbs" and "mouth plates" of a stingray.
Pyrite Inclusions:
Rarely, some megalodon teeth have IRON PYRITE (Fool's Gold, ferrous sulfide or iron disulfide [FeS2]) inclusions that formed in the underlying dentin during the 15,000 year long fossilization process. The only way to expose these beautiful crystals scattered in the dentin is to polish off the overlaying enamel and cementum.
"Reformulated" Formation:
A fossil formation that has been created mainly out of fossils washed out of other, earlier formations. This redeposition can be done by the action of ocean wave or river currents.
For a very comprehensive discussion of this topic along with drawings, click on:
Fossil Formations
Restoration:
Some dealers, in order to improve the appearance of fossilized teeth, add epoxy and coloration to missing areas of the teeth. These teeth are easily spotted by the shine on the enamel or the consistency of the appearance of a section of the root or enamel.
In buying restored teeth you can generally get a better looking specimen, but serious collectors shy away from restored teeth.
Get a statement from the seller that his teeth are not restored, varnished, painted, glued or preserved in any manner. The value of teeth treated in this manner is greatly diminished and they are HARD TO RESELL IF THE POTENTIAL BUYER KNOWS THAT THEY HAVE BEEN ALTERED.
For more information click on: Restoration
Shine:
Many of the fossilized megalodon teeth in North America are found as result of eroded matrix. This erosion occurs in rivers and ocean beach "washes". This erosion also causes deterioration in the shine of the blade enamel. This is caused by the "sandblasting" effect of the sediment (mostly sand) carried in the current dulling the finish of the enamel. Most of the Moroccan teeth, for example, do not go through this type of erosion and the blade enamel is quite shiny. Some few land-found, East Coast megalodon teeth escape this type of deterioration and the enamel is judged as having an excellent "shine". Some of our teeth from the St. Mary's River are very shiny because our divers pull them directly out of the matrix formation before the current can tumble them downstream. The land-found teeth from Summerville, Lee Creek, Nazca (Peru) and some areas in Maryland and Virginia have also escaped this dulling process.
In order to show the base color and mottling of the enamel, the individual photographs were carefully taken to avoid reflecting light. The beautiful shine on some of these teeth can not easily be appreciated by looking at the photographs.
Stage (European):
A very important division of Geological Time. See:
MegMawL: Geo-Timeline
Taxa, Taxon:
The Linnaean system comprises seven major categories, called taxa (singular: taxon, meaning "rank"). Arranged from the broadest, most inclusive category, to the narrowest, most exclusive category, these taxa are:
KINGDOM
PHYLUM
subphylum
CLASS
subclass
superorder
ORDER
FAMILY
subfamily
GENUS
SPECIES
According to Linnaeus' system, each species is given a unique, two-part name called a binomen. Each binomen consists of a genus and species epithet. The species is the basic unit of classification and the only 'natural' one. All other taxa are arbitrary, and therefore subject to changes due to new data or interpretations.
The species name is NEVER capitalzed; all other tax names are capitalized.
GENUS - Carcharocles; Species - megalodon
Tooth Size:
One of the most frequent questions we receive is, "What size shark did my tooth come from?". Others are "Was my tooth from an adult or juvenile?" and "Was it from a male or female?". Another question to complicate the discussion would be "Where in the mouth did this tooth come from?". These are easy questions if we are talking about a 6 7/8 inch tooth. They are extremely hard questions to answer for many of the smaller teeth for these reasons:
We think that the megalodon evolved over a 20 million year period. At the end of this time, megalodon had evolved into the largest it had ever been. Then for whatever reason, the species became extinct. A 6 7/8 inch tooth would have come from one of these animals who lived about 2 million years ago. The shark would have been a mature female, 60 to 70 feet long and weighed 80,000 pounds. It most likely would have been an upper Anterior tooth.
Let's suppose that the species started out 22 million years ago as a descendant of Carcharocles chubutensis. Let's also suppose that a mature adult of that time reached a length of 25 feet. The largest tooth in her maw would only have been about 2 3/4 inches in slant height.
How do we describe the animal that a 3 inch tooth came from? Was it from a mature shark that lived 20 million years ago or a juvenile that lived 6 million years ago? Further complications come from changes due to ontogenetic stages in the development of an individual shark and species variation due to relative geographical isolation.
One of the ways we could be relatively comfortable with an intelligent speculation would be to date the strata that the tooth came from. Most of the river teeth and all of the teeth from "REFORMULATED" formations can not be dated in this manner because of the absence of "index fossils" or the mix of "INDEX" fossils that originated in the original layers that were "reformulated".
********
A word or two about "Carbon Dating". You can't date material that has no radioactive material in it. In archaeological "digs" they often depend on things containing CARBON that are in the same geological layer to DATE the artifacts they find there. An example would be the charcoal remains of the "campfires" in the same strata of the bones they are trying to date. If the bones are not too old, they still have some organic compounds (material containing carbon-14) present and dating is possible.
Radiocarbon Dating can not be used to date megalodon teeth because the "half-life" of carbon-14 is 5,568 years and after 55,000 years, most of it has disintegrated into nitrogen-14. (Carbon-12 is the "common", non-radioactive form of carbon that we are most familiar with - like pencil leads. C13 and C14 are isotopes.)
Radiometric Dating can utilize other elements like potassium and argon to date older layers, but these are generally associated with volcanic ash. If there were no nearby volcanos during the time the fossil layer was being deposited this method can not be used.
********
In summary, there are no easy answers to these questions. Sadly, what we know about this magnificent beast is greatly outweighed by what we do not.
Unconformity:
An interruption in the normal time-sequence of deposition of rock or soil layers that reflects the geological record. This could be caused by erosion removing some of the layers or a fault shifting the layers. Environmental forces such as glaciers, ocean incursions and wind can erode and remove the upper layers. The gap in time between the exposed layer and later layer deposits is a "discontinuity" or an "unconformity".
Underlies:
UNDERLIES means that one FORMATION lies under another and is therefore older.
Velvet Enamel:
The blade enamel instead of being shiny is more like suede leather or velvet material. This is very unusual and occurs in only a few locations like the teeth from some sections of the St. Mary's River. This characteristic is thought to be caused by microscopic cracks in the enamel surface in addition to the large swelling cracks.
Zone:
The term ZONE refers to the fundamental unit of biostratigraphy and also to a notation used by scientists to define a time period of a FORMATION. The timeframe of the ZONE is defined by the presence of characterized, Index or Guide Fossils. Nannofossils such as foraminifera, ostracodes, and inoceramid prisms are used to define certain zones. These were small organisms which evolved rapidly, thus their characteristics at a given point in geo-time are well known.